School use various methods to try and increase grades. What are the different methods they use? Which one is the most effective?
It is believed that schools make serious efforts to intensify level, including teacher coaching and improving amenities. Therefore, having good amenities is the best way.
Two measures that schools can undertake to boost grades are to provide training teachers and having adequate facilities. When teachers are given opportunities to participate in training, it brings better qualities and abilities of teachers, so as to motivate honor students and to give school appreciation. Furthermore, when schools have good amenities such as laboratories and sports fields, the students have the opportunity to practice and competency. Evidence suggests that, in 2020 the Indonesian Government launched a program called special territory teacher training to improve teacher competence. It might be acceptable, but training program is usually only as a formality not as a learning method, so the outcome is not maximum.
What is more, teacher's ability is important, but if it is not supported by passable facilities then the learning cannot work properly. That is to say, good and complete facilities in the school can encourage learning activities and provide good academic performances in competing to other schools, so the reputation of the school becomes greater than others. Evidence appears to indicate that, parents tend to send their children to international schools such as the British School of Jakarta that have facilities that can support both academic and nonacademic capacities.
To conclude, teacher training and developing facilities are two ways that can enhance school grade. Hence, tools and infrastructure are the most effective method since pushing students and teachers is more productive. Where possible, human resource development focused on teacher's skills should be put into consideration as to support facilities provided in the school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-09 | nur pitriyah etika | 81 | view |
| 2022-03-02 | bgs.id | 61 | view |
- The pie charts below show some units of household spending in United Kingdom and Canada in 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 60
- Many processed foods and ready made meals contain preservatives and chemicals what are the advantages to this do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The table below shows the table made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of school leavers from three schools in the same town who went on to higher or further education Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...er qualities and abilities of teachers, so as to motivate honor students and to give sch...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
...lled special territory teacher training to improve teacher competence. It might be accepta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, therefore, as to, such as, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68100358423 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00682454106 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5770609319 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5984052571 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.923076923 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116368120559 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463620591918 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037495409672 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726949954853 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357953625169 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.