The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
“To err is to human”. A very famously known phrase that means that making an error is part of being human. But not learning from it is being dope.
When a child is born, a child emulates his mother or other people around the house. During this process of growth, there are several times when a child does and does not do the right thing. Because the learning span of a child is unbelievably wide, how the elders reflect to the child’s notoriousness can create a huge impact on the young seed. It is important to take into account every action of the learner if the intention is to teach.
If positive actions like watering the plants or helping their mother, are not lauded or even acknowledged, the child will lose all motivation to help and grow up with the attitude of no one believing in him, or that nobody cares.
Whereas negative actions like speaking back to an elder, or ill-treating a worker in the household are ignored, they can result in making the neophyte being brash and sanctimonious in nature. Because the child is winsome and innocent, the elders tend to let go of his/hers negative actions. But that should never be the case.
Reflecting on a child’s or for that matter, any human’s negative as well as positive actions is imperative for the elders or the more experienced.
The same concept can be applicable to a fresher in his new job. Mentors responsible to carry out the settlement and working of a first-time employee, need never overlook a negative action and must praise his positive action.
If the mentor avoids acknowledging the work of a fresher, it could result in a lack of interest and invalid work in the future.
Conclusively, it is important for any didactic being, to take into account both kinds of actions in the learner. Whether it be praising or refuting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er. Whether it be praising or refuting.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71698113208 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65682144858 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.6267448764 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2352941176 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184851260213 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512667182769 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659317861474 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799296825078 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596154567732 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.