The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962

Essay topics:

The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton, a neighboring town , since 1962

The maps illustrate the main changes which have taken place in a village called Meadowside and a town called Fonton, an adjoining city, at three periods of time 1962, 1985, and the present.

Overall, both regions are experiencing significant growth and development, and by the end of the eighties, both of Meandowside and Fonton interfere with each other.

In 1962, Meadowside and Fonton were two places apart with no connection or connectivity between them. While Fonton had a train tracks that running through the city, Meadowside was having a road running through the village. After more than twenty years, a route has been constructed to link between the two cities; the government erected a road from Meadowside to Fonton. In addition to, a new housing estate was constructed and leisure complex were completely renovated. Also a super store had been added.

Presently, the two areas interfered with each other to become one and large town. A business park has been established in front of the road. There is also a new train track added to the railway. And finally, a hotel was opened opposite the railway station.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-15 tata 78 view
2022-03-15 tata 84 view
2022-03-15 tata 84 view
2022-03-15 tata 78 view
2022-03-15 tata 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of time 1962, 1985, and the present. Overall, both regions are experiencing s...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and Fonton interfere with each other. In 1962, Meadowside and Fonton were two ...
^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...sure complex were completely renovated. Also a super store had been added. Prese...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed. Also a super store had been added. Presently, the two areas interfered with...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s opened opposite the railway station.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07486631016 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67281265311 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5151128633 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2727272727 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259680083844 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739619912831 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11235812619 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149545125402 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146440517465 0.0819641961636 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.