Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the majority of countries have imported their food. A highly controversial issue today relates to whether nations should generate sources of food locally or not. In this essay, I will examine why producing food that relies on national sources is vital to ensuring and controlling food security moderately.
For a prolonged period, countries worldwide have been importing varieties of food from other countries. To begin with, some sectors of society believe that this is the only strategy to address the expanding demand for specific products. Furthermore, importing food products that are not cultivated locally allows a government's people to experience and use them. For illustration, China is the world's greatest producer of sugar. Still, they have been importing a substantial amount of glucose to adapt to the standard eating of its ever-growing inhabitants. All in all, these several reasons have shown that acquiring products from other countries is a valuable method to tackle urgent food issues.
Regardless of the reasons mentioned above, the opinion of transitioning food products from other countries all over the world is completely inaccurate. Initially, imported foodstuffs are stored and shipped internationally, causing them to lose freshness and nutrients; meanwhile, locally cultivated produce provides fresh and new food products. Scientific Oxford University researchers have proved that local food includes about 79% fresher and healthier than imported stuff. Additionally, imported commodities allure the contemporary public attention, making it more difficult for local farmers to produce their crops and make a living, frequently forcing them into debts or unemployment. In brief, it is undeniable that exported food has brought numerous disadvantages rather than advantages.
In conclusion, people have numerous differing opinions on whether food should be generated locally or imported. However, from my perspective, I have faith that producing local food has always been an active method chiefly of governments to resolve emergency food security as soon as possible.
- Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and school To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- People say that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers people lose the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Computers do help children to learn more effectively On the contrary their usage has a negative effect on both the physical and mental development of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many countries now have people from different cultures and ethnic groups. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the greatest'.
Suggestion: worlds the greatest
...se them. For illustration, China is the worlds greatest producer of sugar. Still, they have bee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, while, in brief, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73566878981 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99987997921 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611464968153 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.932985292 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303695784746 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107667805662 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360882463344 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197241242827 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306040047423 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.