Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is indisputable that teachers play a pivotal role in transferring knowledge to new generations. However, it is claimed that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Personally, agree with this for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, advanced technologies have contributed to the availability of many substantial sources of education rather than teachers. Learners no more ultimately depend on teachers for gaining appropriate education. Not to mention, they can attain a certificate in a specific field by enrolling in a digital course, that entitles recorded lectures and online examinations. For example, due to the covid -19 situation, all students were forced to stay in quarantine. Since it was not convenient for them to attend classes and interact with their teachers, they were required to do research papers on all subjects with the help of various internet resources to graduate. This altered the viewpoint of learners to educators. Students concluded that teachers can be replaced with a wide variety of resources. On the contrary, in the past, learners were obliged to attend classes in person and were acquired their degrees based on their class attendance and interaction. This interaction was valued by the learners who believed that their educators are the only certified source of education.
Second, the wages of teachers have changed the way people perceive teachers. To be specific, teachers are not paid well nowadays. Unlike football players, media entertainers, celebrities whose salaries are skyrocketing. For this reason, people value these people more than teachers. Accordingly, new generations see these celebrities and football players as role models because of their highly paid jobs. If teachers were paid as much as them, young youth would have higher perceived them. On the other hand, teachers in the past were paid well enough to afford their living expenses and luxuries. For example, my father was a teacher in the 1980s. He would earn well enough that we could live in a big house, and travel every year to Europe. On the contrary, my husband who works as a high school teacher nowadays, can’t afford the living expenses anymore. Thus, he had to work an extra job to be able to cover the financial expenses of our family. For this reason, learners don’t view teachers as valued and appreciated members of society.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 73
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 73
- A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx preserved in volcanic ash was discovered in Liaoning China in 1996 Interestingly the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones Some paleontologists interpret the lines as 87
- some people prefer to work more hours and get paid more others prefer to work less and get paid less which one do you prefer and why 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, for example, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20865139949 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81874815842 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552162849873 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3270434653 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2916666667 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54166666667 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266099277065 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713810489203 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882557253959 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216247499239 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880817810203 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.