In the future, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, researchers and companies do lots of research about driverless vehicles. In the future, passengers can travel elsewhere inside cars, buses with the absence of drivers. This idea can bring lots of benefits for our society, but somewhat the downsides still exist. From my perspective, I think the benefits will outweigh those disadvantages and I will discuss in this essay.
On the one hand, the development of the driverless system has several impressive results that people will be attracted and persuaded. First of all, the driverless car will be equipped with a modern navigation system, which can show the route and time on the way. AI statistic and analysis will be more accurate than human, so passengers can rely on this system. In addition, travelers can avoid careless drivers, even drivers with alcohol drinking, hence, less collision occurs in this situation. Besides, without the driver's presence, people will feel safer and more comfortable, especially woman who takes a taxi during the night.
On the other hand, there are some potential disadvantages if driverless vehicles are widespread. Nothing will exist forever, in unfortunate situations, for example, when the software system is broken down, the car can not analyze information well, which leads to wrong function and travelers can not reach their destination. Moreover, if a car accident occurs, that car has to stop and wait for permission from the centre, which may cause unpunctuality.
In conclusion, passengers can experience driverless vehicles in the future. Although I think the advantages outweigh the drawbacks, more effort should be done to improve bad influences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The charts below give the information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the main information by reporting and selecting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of enery in the USA since 1980 with the projection until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drivers'' or 'driver's'?
Suggestion: drivers'; driver's
...in this situation. Besides, without the drivers presence, people will feel safer and mo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38846153846 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89448312214 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626923076923 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0895286978 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.071428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338160204313 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115042862802 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737276755531 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199094668554 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565510597917 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.