Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Equality is an issue that has gained greater publicity recently. Although I believe men and women should have equal opportunities to develop, it is unfair and impractical to ensure the same number of both genders in every university course.
To begin with, recruiting the same proportion of men and women on all degree courses is simply out of the question. Obviously, the number of students in any given course is dependent on the application that the institution receives. Therefore, if the university were to fill each course with equal numbers of both sexes, it would need sufficient applicants of each site. In reality, some courses are more popular among one gender than the other, such as arts and languages where females by and large predominate. For these reasons, it is unrealistic for any university or college to only open a course when the register numbers of both genders are the same.
Apart from the concern expressed above, it is also unfair to base admission to university classes on gender. An educational institution should be entitled to the right to select the appropriate candidates for their courses. In this way, accepted male and female candidates are at the relatively similar level of competency, which means they can fairly compete with each other. However, if an able student is rejected because of a school’s preference for numbers, then not only is this school unethical, but also fails to function as an agent of producing capable workforce for society. As a consequence, this illogical policy could result in groups of disaffected graduates who were either turned down by their desired schools or forced to study the major they were not interested in. it is not a surprise if they cannot contribute much to society.
In conclusion, the selection of university students should be based on merits, and it would be both impractical and unfair to change to a selection procedure based on gender.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | yomost232131 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | hien2422006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | lee giang | 73 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 90
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road system Some people think that the government should pay for this Others however think that the users should pay for the cost Discuss both views and give your opinion 70
- Some cities have vehicle free days when private cars trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses taxis and metro on vehicle free days To what extent do you think the advantages of 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, apart from, in conclusion, such as, by and large, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.059375 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80675628785 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4680552214 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.642857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169369588713 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549482003753 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457350841554 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107289958338 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371996812929 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.