The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places.
What are the serious problems?
What measures can be used to solve these problems?
These days, an increasing number of people tend to migrate from rural to urban areas for the sake of jobs. Although this trend can result in adverse impacts on both places, there are several potential solutions to tackle them. / a number of possible solutions could be taken to tackle them.
There are several potential problems associated with this migration. Firstly, moving from farming regions to cities would probably have a detrimental impact on the environment. To give an illustration, a massive number of people tend to settle down in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam annually because this prosperous city offers handsome job opportunities. However, a high population density leads to air pollution because of a substantial amount of CO2 emitted by personal vehicles which are the primary mode of transport in this city. Secondly, agricultural provinces may have to suffer labour shortages for production activities. This is likely to deteriorate the national economy as agriculture is one of the main sectors in some countries.
To tackle the problems of migrations, certain measures can be conducted. The first solution would be updating public transport systems, particularly bus or subway. The most concerning reason for air contamination comes from fossil fuels such as gas, petrol and oil which can be replaced by alternative sources of energy to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide and enhance the air quality. In addition, the investment in top-notch machines is considered to supersede the traditional labour workforce. This would help farmers cope with a scarcity of workers, boost productivity as well as contribute to the economic growth in countries relying on agricultural production.
In conclusion, the fact that people leave farming areas and move to urban ones can cause urban pollution and a lack of agricultural workers. Nevertheless, these problems would be alleviated by using alternative energy and utilising machines to replace human labour.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-28 | denistran85 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | trangluu1598 | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 78
- MORE AND MORE CHILDREN IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE BECOMING OVERWEIGHT THIS IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN WEALTHY COUNTRIES CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THIS TREND 89
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and repairing the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, as for, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42207792208 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97950182278 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.295812081 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223539285763 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702934945208 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686614933638 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140991528536 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533775920256 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, as for, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42207792208 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97950182278 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.295812081 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223539285763 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702934945208 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686614933638 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140991528536 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533775920256 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.