The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
The bar charts illustrate data about the collection of garbage by a recycling facility over a five-year period between 2011 and 2015.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there was a constant change in the number of waste collection by a recycling centre throughout the period. Paper waste took up a vast majority of the charts while the figure for gardens was by far lower.
In 2011, paper garbage reached a number of 57 tons. After that, it considerably dropped in the next two years and hit a trough of 40 tons in 2013. In the first year of the period, the figure for garbage from glass, tins and gardens were 48, 35 and 32 tons, respectively. Waste with regard to these three sources faced a bottom in 2012, which accounts for 41, 37 and 15 tons, respectively. The figure for them then quickly rose back in 2013.
Over the following two years, paper waste consistently went up and reached a peak of 70 tons in 2015. In 2014, three kinds of waste steadily decreased and then peaked at 52, 39 and 35, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Topic Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour 56
- Topic Today parents spend little free time with their children Why is this the case Who are more affected parents or children 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 67
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or the same conditions of work for life Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52941176471 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49782426986 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593582887701 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0940508779 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249595723701 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881386404434 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867257789584 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162288507519 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086932104098 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.