Many people choose to travel abroad to learn a foreign language instead of studying in their home town. Do the advantages of learning a new language in this way outweigh the disadvantages?
Depending on an individual’s condition and circumstance, students can consider one of two following strategies of learning language: learning abroad or studying in their hometown. In my perspective, students learning a new language in a foreign country can gain more benefits than drawbacks.
On the one hand, learning foreign language abroad can bring about lots of advantages for students. Firstly, being immersed in a language is more conducive for language learning. That students contact with native speakers frequently helps them have more opportunities to practice language. They can comprehensively imitate the way that native speakers use their own language in all aspects of learning language such as vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, internation... Secondly, learning abroad means that students have an awesome chance to get exposed to different cultures and customs of indigenous residents, this also can enrich their language capacity.
On the other hand, learning abroad can cause several disadvantages to students. Firstly, learning in a foreign country may be more expensive because students must pay the rent, flight tickets, for example. With this money, students can attend a high-quality language course in their hometown. However, some students can do part-time or casual jobs with higher income when learning in some wealthy countries. Besides, with the advantage of facilitating language acquisition, this investment is worthwhile for affluent students. Secondly, learning abroad takes students some time to be familiar with the new environment. Some students can waste their time as they can adapt to the new conditions and have to return to their hometown.
In conclusion, although there are some troubles when learning in a strange country. Nevertheless, with the advantages that learning abroad can bring about, students should be motivated to step out of their safety horizon by seeking new challenges in new environments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-13 | vonhuquynh | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | vonhuquynh | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | vonhuquynh | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people choose to travel abroad to learn a foreign language instead of studying in their home town Do the advantages of learning a new language in this way outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services how happy are you with our IT support offered and current opening hours 73
- Writing task 2 Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture Do you think it is important for children to be taught art Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68941979522 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05777668458 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525597269625 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2295697072 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336153230016 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133716144688 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593640593578 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23632172257 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393829247018 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.