leadership naturally or acquied
Wether leadership, or any other personality traits, are attainable qualities or not, depends on the lens through which one is looking. Some may argue that people can be trained to acquire any kind of characteristics they might desire, while others might believe that a person's nature cannot be altered. All that said, I believe that a characteristic such as leadership cannot be learned. I will demonstrate my ideas further as follows.
Firstly, I believe that a person's qualities depends to a great extent on their early years of childhood and the environment they have grown in. In my opinion, while some conditions and challenges a child might face in early childhood can contribute to formination of a great leader in the future, different environments can have such irreversible effects on a person's personality that they may require extensive practice and self awareness to be able to lead. For example, I am a first child and my family was in critical conditions in my early years of school. Thus, I had to comfort my family members and my little brother in addition to managing my own day to day life and studies. This led to development of leadership skills in my personality. On the contrary, my younger brother was always cared for and supported. He had all the help he required in early childhood and our family was in better conditions. So, I think this might be one of the reasons he does not possess acceptable leadership qualities now.
Secondly, when it comes to leadership, one must point out all the disadvantages that come with this particular quality. Although it is quite enjoyable to be in charge and assert your own ideas, leadership comes with ample responsibilty as well. People who have not been leaders their whole life exprience the relief that one gets from following. When a team fails or does not deliver what is required of them adequately, their leader takes the blame most of all. Subsequently, many people who are not natural leader would not be too eager to work tirelessly on themselves to make the change. Frankly, to not be a leader is less stress and less work. For example, I had a friend in a research team who was more qualified than the leader but when I asked her why she did not run team, she pointed out there is too much responsibility, and she did not believe she could handle it.
In conclusion, a personality trait such as leadership is not acquireable because its formation is rooted in early years of childhood, and people are not enclined to do the hard work it takes due to abundence of responsibilities that comes with leadership.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... through which one is looking. Some may argue that people can be trained to acquire a...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...sire, while others might believe that a persons nature cannot be altered. All that said...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...can have such irreversible effects on a persons personality that they may require exten...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, frankly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.796875 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.890609487 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504464285714 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1739185782 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.45 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.15 5.45110844103 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124739467371 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421284423842 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486615696928 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923848366743 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036722728981 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.