In the number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money and constructing new railways lines for very fast trains, others believe the money should be spend on improving existing public transport.
discuss both views and give your opinion?
Some groups of people living in some regions do opine it is more fruitful to invest in building new railways which fast trains get passed on while others do say enterprising old transportations should get prioritized over the former perspective. Although both have their own pros within contemporary era, investing in transportation acceleration in terms of having new faster options would be more beneficial and crucial. This essay will elaborate on both existing views and will scrutinize both perspectives.
On one hand, people's lives significantly get tied with existing transportations vehicles as they get used to go to work by or even get their chores accomplished. To illustrate, within daily lives, what people do get on to go to depicted destination would be bus, taxi or even public train. As though crowded atmosphere roaming these zones seem to be mostly annoying, hardly ever could these people live a life without such commodities. Based on daily habits and also low expenditure spent on public transportation, it is presumed to be more reliable to invest budget in these existing options.
On the other hand, technology and daily improvements would make every society think about other better possible options to make life standards ameliorated and in addition get life pace improved. Clearly, allocating enterprises to such options just as faster train vehicle and its infrastructures prompt in saving time that consequently could reach accomplishing more goals as adequate time is dedicated to other opportunities. For instance, the highly qualified people who try to set a very clear blueprint will definitely take time into a consideration if other faster transportation is available. So, this investment would reap the benefits to save time and makes it possible to gain higher life qualities. I personally do opine saving time is a more prominent factor rather than monetary factors in today’s world.
All in all, in today’s societies opposite opinions exist describing the benefits investing in old transportation system and building new faster ones would bring. Of course, both views have series of advantages, Considering the latter one will be more determining as it prompts in more time saving which this time could be easily allocated to other tasks by which some eye-catching accomplishments could be acquired. This essay elaborated both views and some examples were mentioned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-04 | Sarina2021 | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people argue that companies and private individuals rather than governments should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The Statement should reflect your ability to communicate clearly and provide an overview of your academic and research background your professional and career goals and your area of research interest Additionally the Statement should describe a rationale 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some groups of people living in some reg...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and will scrutinize both perspectives. On one hand, peoples lives significantly...
^^^
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to going', 'used to gonna'.
Suggestion: used to going; used to gonna
...ng transportations vehicles as they get used to go to work by or even get their chores acc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vest budget in these existing options. On the other hand, technology and daily ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han monetary factors in today’s world. All in all, in today’s societies opposit...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35789473684 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10639586834 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6120218691 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.733333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197530090981 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680212885439 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399851628416 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127976397881 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427722148726 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some groups of people living in some reg...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and will scrutinize both perspectives. On one hand, peoples lives significantly...
^^^
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to going', 'used to gonna'.
Suggestion: used to going; used to gonna
...ng transportations vehicles as they get used to go to work by or even get their chores acc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vest budget in these existing options. On the other hand, technology and daily ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han monetary factors in today’s world. All in all, in today’s societies opposit...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35789473684 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10639586834 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6120218691 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.733333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197530090981 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680212885439 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399851628416 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127976397881 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427722148726 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.