WRITE A SURVEY REPORT ON STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE LEARNING IN ONE SPECIFIC SUBJECT/COURSE.
Introduction
Based on the stress and difficulty to control the epidemic situation, online learning for students has been applied to ensure the progress of the program. This survey aims to find out students' perceptions of online learning, specifically in a speaking skills course.
Method
The research was done by creating a survey and sending it to a part of foreign language students via email to complete. Everyone gave different opinions on the questions and suggested some new ideas for the course.
Findings
Figure 1
According to the progress of the program, most of the students of the foreign language department have taken a speaking course. We have received a student satisfaction rating when taking an online speaking course, this is shown in Figure 1. 72% of students have a high level of satisfaction but also 16% of students. low satisfaction level option. The remaining 12% is for the average level. There are many reasons leading to such survey results such as dislike of talking, unstable network connection, and hate screen exchange.
Figure 2
50 students were asked about the difficulties that students had when participating in the online class on Speaking skills at home during the pandemic. Figure 2 shows that many students feel unable to keep up with the speed of teaching and the amount of knowledge imparted by the lecturer. This reason is the most chosen, accounting for 53%. Besides, there are also 15 students (30%) having difficulty doing homework. The poor awareness of some students makes group work uncoordinated and ineffective, this accounts for 17%.
Figure 3
In addition, the survey asked for opinions: the interaction between lecturers and students in online courses is better than offline. More than half (52%) disagree with this view because face-to-face interactions are better. 41% of students agree with this view and 7% do not respond to this question.
Figure 4
Figure 4 assesses student satisfaction with learning materials. Students taking the course are provided with the same curriculum and different materials depending on the instructor. 81% of the participants felt extremely satisfied in this regard. Only 5% of the evaluations were not satisfied and 14% of the students chose to be quite satisfied. We will have some adjustments in the future to suit everyone.
Figure 5
Finally, students are invited to come up with some ideas to contribute to improving the online speaking course. We have four ideas mentioned, where 40% of students suggested having speaking practice at home through video recording or dialogue. The next most received opinion (31%) was to prevent students from using scripts during presentations, discussions, and rehearsals. 19% recommend encouraging people to interact more during the learning process. The remaining 10% is for the idea of creating games, games that inspire learning. The ideas students give are very interesting and will be applied in the future.
Conclusion
Thus, the online speaking skills course as well as other subjects introduced during the epidemic period has helped students to both acquire knowledge and protect their health. Most students prefer online learning to offline learning, but it is undeniable that online learning is not highly effective. Our survey is in one course but it also makes it possible for us to evaluate other courses. And in the future, we will continue to expand and have more interesting surveys.
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes again when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problems 89
- me businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the incre 56
- Many people think that regional bonus points in Vietnamese national high school examination increase the required admission points of many universities and deprive students from large cities of entering top universities because of not having this priviled 73
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Low
... satisfaction but also 16% of students. low satisfaction level option. The remainin...
^^^
Line 32, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive, this accounts for 17%. Figure 3 In addition, the survey aske...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 55, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts in the future to suit everyone. Figure 5 Finally, students are invited ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, if, so, thus, well, as for, as to, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2998.0 1615.20841683 186% => OK
No of words: 550.0 315.596192385 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45090909091 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80706369924 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 176.041082164 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505454545455 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 873.0 506.74238477 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 16.0721442886 205% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2700664239 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8484848485 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281138027568 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686708479897 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686446526346 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147296482598 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832596909416 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.