Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Advertisings should be directed toward that ones who are able to perform critical thinking before purchase the announced product. It is known that children are not able to perform such a difficult task. I strongly support the idea that television advertising directed toward very young children should not be allowed. I feel this way for the following reasons.
Firstly, children, specially the youngers, do not have psychological maturity that is necessary to filter or select information. Besides, they are not able to decide what is good or bad for them. Therefore, advertising of products that are consumed by the little ones should be directed toward parents, who are able to make decisions. The outcome would be an enhance in consumer confidence.
Secondly, if this kind of advertising is not controlled, a massive quantity of products that are not safe or healthy could be announced. Which could foster bad habits toward young children, not only nutritional bad habits but also behavioral. For example, they would like to eat every kind of candies that are presented in a colorful and fun way. Furthermore, if parents do not allow them to eat this attractive food they would throw a tantrum in order to obtain what they want.
Finally, as they are not mature yet, the advertising could promote deleterious consuming behavior in young children. They would demand all products they see in television. Consequently, this would generate a consumer culture in kids. On the other hand, if they are not exposed to this so early, they have increased chance to not be youngs or adults with noxious consumer habits.
To sum up, I strongly believe that the television advertising directed toward young kids should be prohibited. Since it is nefarious and ineffable to prematurely promote such consumer habits and culture at this age range.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 83
- Chevalier de Seingalt 10
- Passage:Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of a 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...to make decisions. The outcome would be an enhance in consumer confidence. Secondly, if...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, kind of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14617940199 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79757497789 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531561461794 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4063703538 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0555555556 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27777777778 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233243403515 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793723591192 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868269235375 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148096239753 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715156549431 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.