The best way to solve the world's traffic and environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?
It is argued that imposing higher fuel prices is the best measure to cope with the global issues related to traffic and the environment. Personally, I completely disagree with this statement as it seems not to work and there are various methods to tackle the problems.
First, regardless of theoretical beliefs in reducing the number of commuters, raising fuel costs cannot be an effective solution to the current problems. There is no denying that traveling is a necessary activity for humans. People will continue using their private means, which makes them feel convenient, although they are able to struggle with significant increases in fuel prices. Furthermore, many detrimental elements contribute to the growing problems, not only from toxic emissions by transportation but also mainly from industrial activities. In fact, increasing prices of fuel can help limit a small part of the pollution from traffic vehicles but not remarkably affect them when factories and individuals create many environmentally harmful activities.
It should be noted that people can implement many alternative solutions to deal with these hot issues. Research into finding other powerful resources should be strengthened instead of introducing new regulations on fuel costs. Governments and private groups can invest in new innovations and inventions such as electric cars and non-fume manufacturing forms. Educating their citizens about environmental protection also plays a more crucial role than imposing the higher prices of fuel. If people are more aware of the damage that they are likely to face, they will tend to minimize bad habits and use public transport or green products.
In conclusion, I believe that increasing fuel costs will not have any effect and that people can find other more effective solutions to tackle those problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-17 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-20 | moonlucas | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | hoakim | 89 | view |
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert to the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 78
- Some people believe that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than positive effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The world s natural resources are consumed at an ever increased rate What are the dangers of this situation What should we do 61
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4701754386 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90641980535 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635087719298 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.404068705 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.923076923 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133119075338 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450192089671 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453812781477 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882235650504 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324399862068 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.