Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been a colossal upsurge in prodigies discussing the topic of the chance for ameliorating the environment at the present day. Although some people contend that the time for this activity is run out, others believe there still exist opportunities for us to improve the environmental standard. Both sides of this debate will be scrutinized in the following essay while I personally give a green light to the latter statement.
On the one hand, it is undoubted that recovering mother nature costs us an arm and a leg. Noticeably, the quantity of waste at the present day is extremely considerable, and the time for recycling it is countless. To be clear, a piece of plastic needs at least 100 years for the disintegrating process. Moreover, it is hardly unaccepted that some fossil fuels and wild animals have vanished, which is hopeless for use to find the replication. To cite an instance, some endangered animals in Australia drive on the verge of extinction, and no advanced technology can ensure the methods to expand the longevity of these animals. Admittedly, societal development is never procrastinated, which is difficult for us to find the most efficient and effective methods for biological loss.
On the other hand, a range of solutions can give a soothing effect and relieve the alarming issue related to our biological environment. If all the single people have the motivation to give a hand to recover the nature, this problem can be tackled in a short term. To be precise, each individual can be conscious of the repercussions of environmental damage and say no to plastic and fiber products. These behaviors can accelerate the speed of the improving nature process. Obviously, the government can impose strict rules for the resident who behave misguidedly toward the ecology. For instance, the Singaporean government enforced an environmental and hefty fine for people who bring negative influence to its nature. Thanks to its legislation, Singaporeans can become the cleanest nation in the world and reduce tremendous pollutants in the area when compared with the previous time. Finally, parents and educational institutes should drive their children about the adverse impact of the ecological destruction and make sure that we can continue to support and upgrade the quality of our biology for the next generation
In conclusion, the loss of flora and fauna becomes a thorny problem for us to deal with. In spite of the required time and effort for this recovery, I wholeheartedly believe that humans still have enough time to mitigate this abominable trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | UL Finne | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | ktoan | 89 | view |
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language 73
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 84
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 84
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ls have vanished, which is hopeless for use to find the replication. To cite an ins...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, still, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14218009479 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99686875664 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5663507109 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1890260921 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.555555556 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208526131928 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640683700658 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518700128591 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128969235731 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393973246914 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.