Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
There has been a heating controversy about the necessity of studying food science and its preparation. While some people claim that this subject is a waste of time and students should study other essential ones, I personally opine that students should be taught food science and learn to prepare it properly.
On the one hand, students nowadays have had enough burden from multiple compulsory subjects. From natural science to social science, every subject has been research carefully before being involved in the education system to exploit each child's specialty. For example, Math teaches off-springs to think logically, while Literature fosters sympathy; Biology nurtures to-be-doctors, while arts may explore another Picasso or Mozart for mankind. Children's schedules has already been full, and adding only one subject could stress them out.
On the other hand, I adhere to the notion that food science is necessary for several reasons. Firstly, food is the fundamental need of human yet has a great impact on human's health. Scientific researched has shown that 70% of a person's health depends on his or her diet. Moreover, food science has a close relationship to human biology and chemistry. If people understand how nutrition from food affects different body parts as well as the devastation that processed fast food, chemicals and preservatives leave on organs, they are more likely to lead a healthy life. Preparing food is healthier when people can easily control the hygiene and freshness of ingredients as well as the calories loaded into the body.
In conclusion, although students have already been busy with current curriculums, I still subscribe to the idea that time should be made for teaching and learning food science at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Some people believe that the government should ban dangerous sporting activities while others think that people have the freedom do whatever sports they choose 78
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
- Some people say that outdoor activities bring benefits to children s development rather than computer games To what extent do you agree disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...need of human yet has a great impact on humans health. Scientific researched has shown...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ific researched has shown that 70% of a persons health depends on his or her diet. More...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27956989247 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68769888309 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648745519713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2378600663 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321328751272 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954132631605 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103779456083 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201953839456 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113977541519 0.056905535591 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.