Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Planting trees in urban areas is more crucial than establishing more accommodation. It is agreed as helping to decrease the amount of CO2 and providing people with a place to relax.
Reducing the CO2 is one primary reason why growing trees is more essential than building houses, preventing the climate crisis from worsening. More specifically, trees absorb CO2 and produce O2 which later on would outweigh the amount of CO2 in the air. Hence, the lesser CO2 travels in the air, the less likely the temperature increase. For instance, after creating Central Park, an urban park consisting of more than 100 trees in New York City, the temperature dropped by almost 1 degree Celcius in 1980. This is because more O2 were produced and slowly surpassed the amount of CO2 in New York City. Thus, planting trees helps to slow the process of climate change.
Another reason is that adding more trees than housing in urban areas could be a place for people to relax since the O2 produced by trees calms human’s mind. This lowered the number of people developing mental health issues. For example, in 2014, the Ex-Bandung Mayor built more than 10 parks, containing more than 100 trees. Two years later Bandung was awarded as one of the happiest cities in Indonesia referring to an index. The survey stated that parks constructed by the mayor play a huge role in maintaining the positive emotion of all its citizens. Therefore, planting trees could be a safe space for people to empty their minds.
To conclude, the drop in CO2 and the emergence of relaxing places are the two main reasons why it is more crucial to plant trees than build housing in metropolitan areas. If possible, the proportion of green open space should be wider than the proportion of buildings.
- The pie chart conveys the total of electricity units produced in France and Australia between 1980 and 2000 categorized by several source of energies 78
- Average Household Expenditure in 2019 and 2020
- Some people think that drug addicts should be treated as criminals and sent to jail while others believe that they should be treated as patients and sent hospitals 73
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack sleep cause 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1989 to 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8642384106 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51681987117 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55298013245 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2156189729 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31311386854 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10450090417 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737784872366 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216404897542 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335626461841 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.