In many workplaces, online communication is now more common than face-toface meetings. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
Virtual meetings in companies are seen as more ubiquitous recently than offline meetings. This brings more merits as reducing transportation costs and increasing time efficiency, overtaking the drawbacks.
Having online meetings lowers the budget spent on commuting, boosting employees’ purchasing power. Although transport costs could be cut by more than half, most employees experience an increase in their internet bills due to the requirement of having high bandwidth internet speed for video conference. However, many companies have allocated subsidies for this matter. For instance, more than two third of Jakarta’s startup employees claim to have more money to invest in stocks after their companies implemented the Work From Home regulation in 2020 as they did not pay any rent near their workplace and could only work from their parents’ house.
In addition, time efficiency can be encouraged by doing online sync-up, improving employees’ productivity when doing their work. The impact of this is the increasing number of employees suffering from screen fatigue after staring at a screen for too long, nonetheless, limiting screen time is the ultimate viable solution to tackle the issue of screen deprivation. For example, research suggests that more than half of agriculture sector employees’ productivity index skyrocketed three-fold after choosing to do meetings virtually compared to the previous Work at The Office regulations.
In conclusion, low transportation budget and high time efficiency are the two plus points of doing corporate meetings virtually than in person. If possible, this needs to be implemented widely in many other big corporations.
- In many countries plastic containers have become more common than ever and are used by many food and drink companies Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The pie chart conveys the total of electricity units produced in France and Australia between 1980 and 2000 categorized by several source of energies 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally crucial for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 11
- Some people think it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis and swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that drug addicts should be treated like criminals and sent to jail while others believe that they should be treated like patients and sent hospital 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, third, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01403452734 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4161007355 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.909090909 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191982693158 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822842498206 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282367954289 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127421267569 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139149613369 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.