The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants
Given are the bar chart contrasting the figure of people attend different kinds of classes, namely drama, painting, sculpture and language as well as the pie chart delineating the proportion of citizens in terms of ages studying.
Perceptibly, the number of female learners was much more higher compared with men in drama, painting and language except for sculpture. Moreover, the older participated in class, the more crowded the class got.
In terms of female learners, there were remarkable attendances in most of the classes. To be more accurate, The men attending drama and language classes were just in halved compared to women with 10 and 20 respectively while the opposite was true for students in sculpture class. Lastly, female learners in painting were 5 greater than men.
When it comes to the rate of people in different age groups, the oldest group share a reversive pattern to the teenagers with 42% and 5% respectively. Finally, the people in their forties in terms of rate were less than 1% the combination of the 20 to 29-year-olds and the 30 to 39-year-olds.
- The use of corporal punishment physically hitting students in schools is in decline yet it should be used to improve behaviour To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
- The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007 in grams 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar chart contrasting the figure of...
^^^
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
... the number of female learners was much more higher compared with men in drama, painting an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, lastly, moreover, well, while, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00555555556 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83319716448 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8542101848 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13301772143 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538051913706 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043391993819 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824727688108 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486645424733 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.