The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph compares how much carbon dioxide was released per person in 4 different countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, there was a general increase in the amount of carbon dioxide released in Italy and Portugal, while the opposite trend was seen in the figure for the United Kingdom and Sweden. In addition, the emission rate in the United Kingdom was consistently highest during the years examined though it experienced a gradual decrease.
Over 8 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions were released per person in 1967, with a subsequent increase to just over 10 metric tonnes of CO2 emissions, and a final drop to shy of 6 tonnes of carbon dioxide at the end of the period (2007). By contrast, the figure for emissions in Italy started at the north of 4 tonnes, after which it experienced a slight growth to just over 6 metric tonnes in 1977, before ending the period at its peak (around 8 tonnes of co2 emission).
The amount of Co2 emission in the United Kingdom was at roughly 11 tonnes in 1967, followed by a fluctuation of around 11 tonnes released per person, before reaching its low of nearly 9 tonnes of co2 emission in 2007. The figure for emissions in Portugal saw an opposite change, growing annually from the start of the period, reaching the peak of just under 6 tonnes of carbon dioxide at the end of the period
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s 73
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- The population of young people is more than old people in the countries And it benefits us To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64135021097 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47970630667 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447257383966 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.5785462733 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.142857143 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8571428571 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329976867935 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168328649082 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714251164472 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219682553488 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335716754508 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.