Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary era, there is a widespread debate about who should foot the bills in artistic creation. A school of taught opine that rule makers should be responsible for the financial aid, others think other mediums should take up the obligation.
On the one hand, supporters of this view claim that when the leaders gives financial aid to artistic creativity, it will publicize art works. This means that knowledge of art creation may be circulated due to the fact that the parastaters involved are at the center of the nation. Thus more people gets to be informed. In addition, it may be due to dependency on the part of individuals. This implies that citizen feels it is the responsibilities of the rule makers to fund their artistic innovations due to the fact that they pay taxes, as a result, government has an obligation to fulfill in role as such. For example, income generated on taxes are meant to help in the growth of the populace.
On the other hand, opponent of this view allude that, art imagination should be self sponsored because every person should be responsible for his or her profession. As a result, it makes the individual a good person. Another alternative source could be private organisation funding. This means that non governmental field such as group owned company may invest into art works like painting and singing so as to generate more income from the profit made. To exemplify, a reputable industry in Africa was said to have invested in an upcoming song writer, as a result, it yielded into lots of gain for the company and they are thriving well today.
In my opinion, rule makers should bear the cost of artisan because it is part of their call duty and will ultimately make artist abilities famous.
In conclusion, this essay discussed that government should finance art creation as being part of their obligation and that it is mode of Fame for artistic innovation as viewed by some people while others feel it should be individual sponsored by private firms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | killashaw | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | oyinmartha | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Friezzy | 84 | view |
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that only the society should be blamed for any anti social activities What are the causes of these activities Who is responsible for them 78
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 73
- Some children receive almost no encouragement from their parents regarding their performance at school while other children receive too much pressure from their over enthusiastic parents which can have a negative impact on the child Why do you think some 73
- The pie chart give data on the consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...volved are at the center of the nation. Thus more people gets to be informed. In add...
^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nto art works like painting and singing so as to generate more income from the profit ma...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86086956522 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7158136483 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544927536232 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6764316593 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295301505831 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889236152777 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737816696278 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170032905474 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565254273568 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...volved are at the center of the nation. Thus more people gets to be informed. In add...
^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nto art works like painting and singing so as to generate more income from the profit ma...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86086956522 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7158136483 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544927536232 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6764316593 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295301505831 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889236152777 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737816696278 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170032905474 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565254273568 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.