Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.
University study is different from the education in middle school in format, width, depth and diversity. And the university word perse directly means a vast space waiting to be explored, just as the world of unknown knowledge. Thus, to satiate the need of university study, the four aspects mentioned before should be attained by sending students study in a foreign country, where they could have learned diverse, deeper knowledge by enjoying different study method. Even studying abroad has advantages, I still dispute the claim that students should be required to study in another country.
On the one hand, studying abroad contributes to students' ability at all. For format, students spending years in their own country may feel tired of being taught in a same teaching way, thus it could be salutary for those want to find themselves new experiences. Business school students in China that were taught most in traditional class format, which expresses ethereal words and sentences regarding business world, tries to in search of business schools using case study method in other countries. And the same thing happens on the rest three aspects: width and depth is what to be pursued by those determine to put their names on the history of their own researching fields, so if the experts in such fileds are in other country, studying abroad seems to be necessary; and the culture diversity is also an important factor affecting students study road.
On the other hand, while sending students out of country to study possesses benefits, it also contains limitations. The afford ability, for example, is the biggest obstacle to make such claim come true. College students come from different social classes have disparate abilities for studying abroad, and while some try to use scholarship to suture the wage gap between different students' families, we have to admit that the fellowship was prepared for prominent students, more harshly undermining the claim that all college students should study abroad. And the second influencing factor is the need-demand equilibrium. As mentioned before, studying in foreign countries is sometimes valuable for students, but the underlying logic is that, only because those students anticipate oversea studying benefits them, it benefits them. In other word, students believing studying in own country is equivalent or better to study overseas have no needs to study abroad.
In sum, we should acknowledge the benefits of study abroad, but we also need to focus on limitations of that. And as a selection of study, it should not be a required affair due to college students' diversities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-01 | guozhishan | 66 | view |
| 2024-03-31 | shahajan999 | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | tomlee0205 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather andlocal news During this time period most of the complaint 63
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 50
- The following appeared in a memo to the board ofdirectors ofBargain Brand Cereals One year ago we introduced our first productBargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Althoug 77
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company When XYZ lays offemployees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating resumes and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid offemployees have benefited greatly 58
- 1 As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...benefits, it also contains limitations. The afford ability, for example, is the biggest ob...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, second, so, still, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23404255319 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66397010014 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541371158392 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.3003840627 60.3974514979 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.375 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344720897564 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117302488175 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693724941164 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209171069535 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205426437129 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.