In many countries, plastic containers have become more common than ever and are used by many food and drink companies. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Plastic containers have been recently seen as ubiquitous in food and beverage companies. It brings more drawbacks as it pollutes the environment and is hard to be recycled, overtaking the merits.
Plastic containers in many food products contaminate the environment, causing an ecosystem imbalance. Although many animals died from eating microplastics, many brands' plastic use cases keep rising due to the cheap production costs. However, some nations have implemented regulations targetting companies to reduce the number of plastic usages. For instance, over the last decade, the population of Indonesian Tongkol Fish has been heavily contaminated by microplastic disposal, killing more than 1000 fish per month. A considerable decrease in the Tongkol fish population caused a food scarcity of seabirds, causing a high mortality rate among this species.This happened because tons of plastic waste from brands ended up in the sea.
Hardly recycled is another pitfall of food and drink companies commonly use plastic containers, making the waste pile up for an extended period. Although having minimal access to recycling plastic disposal, some technologies have been created aiming to recycle more plastic disposals. However, the plastics produced always surpass the ones that are recycled. For example, a pile of plastic trash from 100 years ago can still be found at some seashore in Bekasi, Indonesia. This massive stack of plastic trash can not be sorted from the materials by the recycling facilities for unspecified reasons, so people would just let it piles up until an unknown time.
To conclude, deteriorating the environment and the difficulty of recycling are the two main plus points why plastic containers are damaging. If possible, policies should be made regarding the plastic containers many food and beverage companies use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | aikzat | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-27 | jaggi and anu | 67 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others at on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 73
- Growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on healthcare system in an effort to deal with health issue involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lesson in the shool curricul 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... high mortality rate among this species.This happened because tons of plastic waste ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 212, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...e made regarding the plastic containers many food and beverage companies use.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, still, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55477031802 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8918974884 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9560029938 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274398544154 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102836484096 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725393628318 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173527161674 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370194453834 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... high mortality rate among this species.This happened because tons of plastic waste ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 212, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...e made regarding the plastic containers many food and beverage companies use.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, still, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55477031802 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8918974884 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9560029938 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274398544154 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102836484096 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725393628318 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173527161674 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370194453834 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.