Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions diverge on whether fresh water should be used freely depending on people’s demand. Although this sentiment can be true to some extent, I rely heavily on the opposition that governments need to manage water consumption due to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, having high sanitary conditions is the main benefit if people are entitled to consume freshwater. It cannot be denied that water is of paramount importance to humans; hence, with enough volume of fresh water, some basic needs such as drinking or washing can be adapted. People in remote areas, for example, have to use water from rivers or streams to serve their living, which leads to myriad diseases like dysentery or diarrhea, meanwhile, the opposite is true with people who have opportunities to use fresh water. Therefore, residents should not be limited in using fresh water so as to avoid some deadly water-borne illnesses.
Conversely, I assert my strong support that governments should have strict rules on using fresh water due to the future benefits and the prevention from physical effects. When it comes to the future merits, the shortage of fresh water can be predicted easily if there is no policy on consuming water. It is perceptible that overpopulation develops more and more complicatedly, which is equivalent to the fact that the more humans are, the lessen source of water is. As a result, food production might also slump if the shortage of water happens, thereby managing the consumption of water. Turning to the latter reason, sinking terrain is the clearest phenomenon to prove the correctness of this sentiment. Scientifically, the ground subsidence is attributed to the lack of water, and the occurrence of earthquakes seemingly worsens.
By way of conclusion, notwithstanding the essence of using water freely. the fresh-water use policy should be managed and operated by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | kevann | 67 | view |
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 11
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 61
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...uld not be limited in using fresh water so as to avoid some deadly water-borne illnesses...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t to the fact that the more humans are, the lessen source of water is. As a result, food p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ding the essence of using water freely. the fresh-water use policy should be manage...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24092409241 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92716018142 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3357436305 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33401723932 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1286191667 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982072507052 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239570514036 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552773437838 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...uld not be limited in using fresh water so as to avoid some deadly water-borne illnesses...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t to the fact that the more humans are, the lessen source of water is. As a result, food p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ding the essence of using water freely. the fresh-water use policy should be manage...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24092409241 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92716018142 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3357436305 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33401723932 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1286191667 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982072507052 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239570514036 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552773437838 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.