Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I mostly agree with the prompt's assertion that government should place few, if any restrictions on scientific research and development. However, I recognize the fact that there must exist a mechanism that keep scientific research and development in control.
First of all, government should place few or no restrictions on scientific research and development because that is the basic unit that stimulate scientific accomplishments in a country. For instance, China is one of the most creative country in the world. Phones, cars, laptops and so on are produced in China due to the access to many research opportunities, not only that, they are encouraged to do so.
Secondly, government should place few or no restrictions on scientific research and development because if it does, it will kill a lot of research inherent skills. Take for instance, every goods producing companies have research and development department. Their role is to brainstorm together on how to bolster the quality of a company's product. If government place restrictions on them, apparently they will have to look for something else to do , hence extirpate their ambitions or inherent abilities.
However, I do concede that Government should create a mechanism that guide their research and development to keep them in control. In the quest for searching for something unprecedented or novel, there is possibility of crossing boundaries. For example, killing people because their body are needed for scientific research, that is anomaly and shouldn't be accepted by any government.
In conclusion, scientific research advantages cannot be overemphasized, it is needed in any country that desire growth, however, caution is needed to keep everything in control.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 83
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants powerful anti aging and immune system boosting compounds Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day the greater the benefits Green tea however contains moder 45
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
I mostly agree with the prompts assertion that government should place ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ll have to look for something else to do , hence extirpate their ambitions or inhe...
^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...cientific research, that is anomaly and shouldnt be accepted by any government. In conc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 270.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43703703704 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19034367729 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503703703704 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.927175751 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282594861743 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11254849114 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854559971098 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171063002678 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712793596366 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.