People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
Over many decades, environmental matters have always been a controversial topic for governments around the world. A good few people believe by uplifting the fossil fuel costs, the number of journeys made by cars and other vehicles can be reduced effectively. I totally agree with this opinion and I hereby suggest some other feasible ways to improve the quality of the environment.
To begin with, raising the cost of fuel can lower the level of air pollution. High petrol expenses will dissuade people from driving their own cars excessively; instead, they may switch to walking or using public transportation to commute to work. This will leave a tremendous help on reducing car emissions and exhausted fumes, which are the greatest contributors of air pollution and environmental issues. For example, in 2018, when New Zealand government applied the policy of increasing the petrol price, people started using public transportation more. As a result, air pollution level fell by 40%.
In addition to the above-mentioned solution to soaring fuel prices, some other potential measures can be added up to tackle environmental issues. Firstly, the government can introduce some transport policies to control the upcoming number of drivers. For example, recently, Vietnam has imposed some new regulations to driving test, making it considerably more challenging to pass. Secondly, national authorities can impose heavier tax on vehicles running on petrol while reduce tax on environmentally friendly transports like electric motorbikes, bicycles, and scooters. As for the capital of Netherlands, Amsterdam is considered one of the most famous destinations for its cycling culture.
In conclusion, I consider increasing the fuel price is one effective method to mitigate environmental issues. Besides, raising the tax on petrol cars as well as controlling the number of drivers is also worth considering.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- Housing areas with taller buildings or building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 89
- scientific research should be funded by government rather than commercial organisation to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say music is a good way of bringing people of different culture and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 61
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'passing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: passing
...making it considerably more challenging to pass. Secondly, national authorities can imp...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50853242321 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10298037821 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627986348123 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9491058541 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261042758245 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780209438659 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433517635863 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156686316611 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050071491496 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.