The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the amount of carbon dioxide emissions (in metric tonnes) per person in four separate countries from 1967 to 2007.
It is clear that there was a decrease in the average CO2 emitted by each person in Sweden, while the opposite was true for the remaining categories. In addition, the amount of CO2 emissions in the UK had the highest figure over the period shown.
The number of carbon dioxide released by a person in Sweden started at nearly 9 metric tonnes, after which it recorded a slight rise to north of 10 metric tonnes in 1977, before declining to nearly 6 in 2007. Opposite pattern can be seen in the figure for Italy, which increased from just over 4 in 1967 to more than 4 metric tonnes after 40 years.
When it comes to the United Kingdom, about 11 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions per individual in this region in 1967, with a subsequent fall to around 9 metric tonnes in 2007. In contrast, the figure for Portugal experienced experienced a dramatic increase from about 1 metric tonnes in 1967 to just over 6 metric tonnes in the final year, comparable with that of Sweden.
- English should be the only global language Do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Nowadays people have cosmetic surgery to improve life Why do many more people choose these operations Do you think this is a positive or negative development 74
- The table shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: experienced
...7. In contrast, the figure for Portugal experienced experienced a dramatic increase from about 1 metric...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast, the figure for Portugal experienced experienced a dramatic increase from abo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44613981612 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.4176454203 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264121988698 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129778363034 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973944088959 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176376363019 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854798705534 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.