Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
By looking back at history we discern people have always helped each other out in the most arduous situation. Some people contend that the sense of responsibility toward our kind has waned in recent years. Personally, however, I believe people nowadays help each other more than any time. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the advent of internet had profound impacts on our daily lives. One of the major positive aspects of internet is the way news dispense rampantly all around the world. Thus, everyone will be aware of any natural disaster that happens in even the most remote area. This news prevails in the internet alongside with pictures of untold harm that a natural disaster brought to a place. These illustrations of other human’s life evoke sympathy in most people around the world, and they will readily help in any possible way. The recent war between Ukraine and Russia is a compelling example of this. After Russia embarked a war in Ukraine boundaries, myriad of Ukrainians fled from their country to Poland. Polish people helped Ukrainians, and procure them with food and a place to sleep. But these anthropologic helps weren’t limited to Poland. People from all around the world collected essential supplies and send them to Ukraine to be a smidge of help during these hard days.
Another reason that is worth mentioning, is the life subsistence of people. Most people in the past had ample of children and only father was responsible to meet family’s needs. However, nowadays, majority of people have only a child and both parents work. Thus, the subsistence level of families raised and it gives them the opportunity to donate money to charities. To be more specific, in the past people barely could keep their own families full, but today people have economical mind and know how to manage a family financially. For instance, my grandfather had nine kids and he was the only one who was working in the family. He had adverse financial situation, therefore he couldn’t even think about charity and helping others. In contrast, my parents both work hard and they only pay for tow kids expenses, therefore they donate a part of their income each year.
In conclusion, humanity have not vanished in recent years and people help each other more than before. They are inclined toward helping because their knowledge has raised and quality of life has improved.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own word 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92512077295 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50667037029 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553140096618 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8769632701 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.9583333333 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294563667636 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752551939758 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569396591159 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173990335047 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139974709976 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.