Q15. Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, the impact of remote business meetings and training sessions on employees has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are some advantages to attending online business meetings and training sessions for workers, these are exceeded by the disadvantages, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that working people can benefit a great deal from participating in business meetings and training sessions on the Internet do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that the introduction of distance business meetings and training sessions has revolutionised the way employees take part in them with greater ease regardless of time and place considering that having access to the Internet is the sole requirement. In addition, workers are able to save time as they do not need to commuting to and from their workplaces. In fact, travelling to and from work often deprives workers huge amounts of time and energy that would otherwise spent on dedication to their occupations.
My opinion, however, is that the drawbacks of partaking in remote business meetings and training session are more significant. Perhaps the principal disadvantage is that employees are more likely to struggle to have a tight grasp of their duties since they often have difficulty receiving instant feedback and advice from their co-workers, which can even exert a detrimental influence on their work performance. Furthermore, if it were not for face-to face business meetings and training sessions for workers, it would be nearly impossible for them to build strong relationships with their colleagues as well as senior managers helping them to develop interpersonal skills that will be invaluable in their future careers. This is mainly because they are incapable of mingling with their workmates in person, which may hinder them from feeling a sense of belonging to their companies and enhancing their bonds.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the drawbacks of attending online business meetings and training sessions surpass the benefits for the reasons discussed above.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 73 | view |
2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 73 | view |
2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 67 | view |
2022-08-04 | hellielts | 73 | view |
2021-09-23 | LUCIALUSO | 84 | view |
- Q19 The family has a great influence on childen s development but the influence from outside the home plays a bigger part in children s life Do you agree or disagree 84
- Q1 Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city centre with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Q9 With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 84
- X 89
- Q15 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'need to commute'?
Suggestion: need to commute
...rs are able to save time as they do not need to commuting to and from their workplaces. In fact, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the draw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40314136126 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88530606544 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534031413613 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.2830390114 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.428571429 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231652032038 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819581995258 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786062119808 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139638661484 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215178419343 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'need to commute'?
Suggestion: need to commute
...rs are able to save time as they do not need to commuting to and from their workplaces. In fact, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the draw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40314136126 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88530606544 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534031413613 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.2830390114 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.428571429 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231652032038 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819581995258 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786062119808 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139638661484 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215178419343 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.