Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is a consensus among people that interviews are not the best method to determine whether an applicant suitable for the job or not. Personally, I am in favor of this view since there are other components to know about the suitability of a candidate.
First, interview is just a small part in assessing the ability of a candidate. Since there are many factors that can affect the performace of the candidate, hence, employers cannot get an overview about the ability of the candidate. To illustrate, some candidates, although brilliant, still feel nervous or confused when answering the questions, which make employers can pick those candidates out of the list of recruitment. As a result, employers can easily lose excellent applicants. Second, in the interview part, the time is also limited from 30 minutes to one hour, thus, employers will not have enough time to gain a crucial insight into the ability of the candidate. For instance, there are still many questions that need being asked about the fields which candidates apply for, but due to limited time, employers do not have a chance to ask them.
However, I opine that there are many key factors contributing to the decision whether the candidate suitable or not. First of all, formal academic qualifications play an indispensible part in the process of recruitment. Given the 21st century witnessed radical changes in technological advancements and breakthroughs. Therefore, all physical demanding jobs are carried out by automation, leaving people with highly skilled jobs. Hence, besides interviews, employers have to recruit employees who have specialized knowledge and skills. Moreover, life experience and personal qualities are also essential factors that can be neglected. It goes without saying that having life experiences can assist employees to deal with difficulties in the job and increase the productivity. Also, employees who have negative personalities such as dishonesty, for example, can affect the development of the company.
In conclusion, I subscribe to the view that interview is not the most effective way to assess whether the candidate suitable for the job or not, instead, there are many factors that contribute to the process of recruitment in terms of life experiences, personal virtues and intellectual ability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-01 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 78 | view |
- Most agree that schools should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth s natural resources However some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feel schools are more responsible Discuss 73
- Some businesses find that new employees who just finished their education lack basic interpersonal ability such as working with other employees as a team What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest 56
- Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think it is happening How to solve this issue 78
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35792349727 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0327487321 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554644808743 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7228566694 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.352941176 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180613220464 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545577706825 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654009610831 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130151447949 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535316394138 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35792349727 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0327487321 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554644808743 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7228566694 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.352941176 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180613220464 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545577706825 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654009610831 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130151447949 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535316394138 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.