Countries are becoming more and more similar because people can buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In the globalization era, every citizen can purchase commodities from everywhere in the world, leading to a controversy that nations are becoming more identical and lacking identity. In my opinion, this situation indeed brings a positive development for human beings.
To begin with, we can discuss the merit of getting similar due to global trading for every country. The ability to purchase and possess foreign products can improve people’s standard of living significantly. The reason is that they can enjoy great quality goods and services that cannot be generated in their mother countries. For example, everyone can drive a car, go on a plane, and use a smartphone even if their country does not produce these things. The gap between developing and developed countries shrinks and people feel more equal in terms of living standards. Owning other nations’ products can also facilitate to manufacture of that country due to mimicking and copying, and this will reinforce the country’s industry and service. To sum up, becoming identical via purchasing goods brings multiple benefits for the inwards of a country.
The benefit does not limit to only a certain country but stretches all over the world. To be more specific, manufacturing will be improved remarkably, triggering the development of the global economy. This enhancement will take place in every nation equally and give rise to eradicating poverty and famine, and improving health facilities and education. Multi-nation corporations always take the lead in funding education and healthcare for underdeveloped countries thanks to the economic benefit they get from global trading. On top of that, people from all over the world can build a strong connection with each other because of their similarities. People from different cultures can get engaged with each other which prevents racism and violence. As a consequence, the diplomatic relationships between each country will be bonded and enhanced, and the world’s conflicts will be mitigated and consolidated.
In conclusion, I have a firm conviction that the movement of getting identical due to purchasing internationally brings beneficial benefits for every country and the world. Even though this can potentially cause cultural assimilation, people can preserve their cultural identity in other ways rather than prevent trading products. The government should impose positive policies supporting exporting and importing activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 89 | view |
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people can buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 89
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55585106383 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99796100733 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571808510638 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0448957911 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.947368421 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264576819095 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802507527051 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476663366718 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169979997106 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413847321389 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.