The maps illustrate an industrial area in Norbiton in the present day compared with plans for future development of the site.
The maps given illustrate the current area of the town of Norbiton, which is used for industries, and its anticipated development in the future.
Overall, it is apparent that the plan is to change the function area, from an industrial to a residential area. While the town, the roundabout, and the farmland will remain unchanged, the area in question will undergo a complete change.
In the current town, there is a roundabout surrounded by some factories which are located next to the road to the right and around the middle. In the future, the roundabout will remain while the factories will be replaced by new facilities such as a school to the East, a playground to the Northeast, and close to the center will be shops and a new hospital.
Furthermore, the present three-way junction will be renovated to become a small roundabout. In the North, there will be a bridge over the river to provide access to the housing located in a small patch of farmland.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-23 | levanhoan123 | 73 | view |
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 78
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work education or shopping To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over it life cycle Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 26.3917525773 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 937.175257732 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 206.0 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79640718563 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79791340271 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 127.690721649 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.5077570734 44.8134815571 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 76.5299724578 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 16.8248392259 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 4.34317383033 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150254060931 0.216113520407 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793241993368 0.0766984524023 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10286485297 0.0603063233224 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110406042137 0.12726935374 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10329461564 0.0580467560999 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 8.37731958763 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.