Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things. Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The influence of advertisements on today's generation is unignorable but some people believe that because of frequent exposure to advertisements, no one really pays any regard to them now.
As far as my opinion is concerned,I accord with the former view. This essay shall deliberate both the ideologies with examples from a survey performed in the US and an academic report from a prominent university.
With the advent of technology, all types of businesses have expanded globally. The main reason behind this is online advertisements. They have irrefutably succeeded in growth of multinational companies. As every individual uses some form of social media and this is taken as a source of advertising. We all come across numerous e-mails and messages about variety of things to purchase, often described as spam. According to survey conducted in New York, USA, 15 companies were asked to send text messages to university students, publicizing their products. The results were very dramatic. The sales of companies went up to 120% , as because of the text messages , more people were able to know about their products.
Furthermore, not only online advertisements, but other methods such as printed templates, posters and hoardings , too have an uncontrollable impact on us. People tend to buy the things which are most publicized, especially by celebrities, even if they do not need them. This is just done to have more possessions in order to flaunt among others.
But there are some people who believe that most of the advertisements are ignored. This is true up to some extent, as most of the people remain busy in their school or work life and they barely even have time to check their spam e-mail folders. Also, most of the people already know what kind of product they want to buy and so they do not pay any deed to look for alternatives provided by advertisements. However, this belief was proven to inaccurate by NGT university, Moscow. They published a report based on the inluence of advertisements on bankers. No matter what amount of work they had, the products of which they had seen the most hoardings about, were on top of their list whenever they went shopping.
To conclude, from the above arguments and examples, I believe that advertisements have surely succeeded in forcing us to buy things, even if most of us are ignorant about them, and this impact is likely to be there in the coming times as well.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-02 | LauraTing | 84 | view |
2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 78 | view |
2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 89 | view |
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 84
- Nowadays some older people choose to live in retirement communities and centers with other people rather than living with their adult children Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- the given chart describes how much variety of food was consumed in 2014
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
The influence of advertisements on todays generation is unignorable but some peop...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...w. As far as my opinion is concerned,I accord with the former view. This essay...
^^
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... The sales of companies went up to 120% , as because of the text messages , more ...
^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o 120% , as because of the text messages , more people were able to know about the...
^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...printed templates, posters and hoardings , too have an uncontrollable impact on us...
^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...nted templates, posters and hoardings , too have an uncontrollable impact on us. People ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, really, so, well, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97549019608 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92302933558 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9216195527 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175299109877 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504444865317 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535937972827 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945287563345 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370349582681 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
The influence of advertisements on todays generation is unignorable but some peop...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...w. As far as my opinion is concerned,I accord with the former view. This essay...
^^
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... The sales of companies went up to 120% , as because of the text messages , more ...
^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o 120% , as because of the text messages , more people were able to know about the...
^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...printed templates, posters and hoardings , too have an uncontrollable impact on us...
^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...nted templates, posters and hoardings , too have an uncontrollable impact on us. People ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, really, so, well, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97549019608 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92302933558 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9216195527 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175299109877 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504444865317 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535937972827 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945287563345 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370349582681 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.