Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree
A number of people discuss about a theme that everyone should help take care of wild animals. In my opinion, I absolutely agree with it.
To support this idea, there are a number of thinks that need to clear. Our environment has been devastated extremely badly by the wastes and emissions from factories, this cause water pollution and axit rain and it will lead to ecological imbalance. Therefor, wild animals doesn’t have any place to live and they may die early. A few species are standing on the brink of extinction. Since then, national reserves were born with the purpose of protecting and providing habitats, food or water for rare species.
On the other hand, Animals are illegally hunted for profit immensely frequently. Ensue the governments and animal protection council all over the world should have measure to protect them not only because each life has its own value but also they play an essential role in the ecosystem. Therefor, we ought to respect all lives and people should treat wild animals like they treat their pets. Contrary to the above argument, some people protest against that because wildlife like bear or tiger may attack someone especially who live near the forest or mountain. for example, There are numerous cases of gray wolves attacking people in North America leading to the death of the unfortunate victim.
In conclusion, the leards ought to use certain degree of resources to guard wildlife and also helps residents stay far from wild beasts to avoid injury.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...y who live near the forest or mountain. for example, There are numerous cases of gr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98015873016 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45299409297 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678571428571 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9149727201 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5384615385 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152520409786 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045312743956 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470013750234 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787773626634 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201332134928 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.