The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Given are two maps delineating the predicted transformations of a Road Systems over a course of time.
It is perceptible that the Road Structures is supposed to experience safety modifications with the elimination of unnecessary parts of some roads along with the addition of traffic lights and roundabout at some intersections.
When it comes to the east side of the Forest Road, which direct from north-east to south-west, the current supermarket is linked with City Road by an unnamed lane. It is envisioned that in the future there are a roundabout in the middle of the Road System which connect neatly to the supermarket.
Moving to the west side of the Forest Road, there are some amenities such as School in the north-west of the map and 2 residential areas settle down in both side of Low Lane. At the moment, there are barely traffic lights at intersections along the Low Lane connect with City Road and the spined-road. In the anticipated ammout of time that there are some engagement at two crossings at the west side with the reconstruction of City Road which directly moving from west to east.
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 73
- The maps below show the changes in an Art Centre from 2010 to today 76
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 84
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'roundabouts'?
Suggestion: roundabouts
...visioned that in the future there are a roundabout in the middle of the Road System which ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96929811604 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.8557951243 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12345499031 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732487739961 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260251819593 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840936287948 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151900185406 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.