The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph taken from a 2008 report gives an insight into energy consumption trends of different fuel types starting from 1980
and ending up 2030.
Overall, the primary source of energy was petrol and oil which are expected to continue its dominance over the shown period,
whereas nuclear, solar/wind, and hydropower sources are always among the least preferable source of energies.
Considering petrol and oil energies in details, although their values fluctuated between 30 and 35 quadrillion units until 1995,
it increased unabated until 2008 and is anticipated to continue this stable rise.
Showing moderate preference among all the energy sources, consumption of coal had been increasing since 1980 which was followed by
a constant trend from 1995, whereas that of natural gas fluctuated around 20 quadrillion units. When it comes to expectations,
coal was projected to rise to approximately 32 quadrillion units, however, no any change was anticipated for the latter one.
Regarding the least favorable energy sources, all could be observed from solar/wind and hydropower was fluctuations around nearly
4 quadrillion units, while nuclear power consumption gradually increased to 8 quadrillion units. According to report, stagnation period
of these three energy sources was expected in the future .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-18 | Nguyễn Nhật | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Nguyễn Nhật | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Nguyễn Nhật | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Toghrul Azizli | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | harshnadhingra | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2015, and future projections for 2005 61
- In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to? 73
- In some countries young people are not only richer but also safer and healthier than ever before However they are less happy What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 89
- The process below describes the chewing gum production. 56
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... different fuel types starting from 1980 and ending up 2030. Overall, the prim...
^^^
Line 12, column 76, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ximately 32 quadrillion units, however, no any change was anticipated for the latt...
^^
Line 14, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ydropower was fluctuations around nearly 4 quadrillion units, while nuclear power...
^^^
Line 16, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nergy sources was expected in the future .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6783919598 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87228132327 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653266331658 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.750091575 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.428571429 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166957564143 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877559852922 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794028714045 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629770123759 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680258821198 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.