The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph reveals information regarding the weekly consumption of fish and some categories of meat in a European country over a period of 25 years in terms of grams per person.
It is worth noting that the consumption of chicken and beef witnessed the most significant changes as opposed to that of fish which saw the most stable trend throughout the period.
Despite being lower than that of beef and lamb in 1979, the consumption of chicken experienced a dramatic increase after overtaking beef, the highest at the start. It reached a high of 250 grams per person per week in 2004 when it became the highest of all.
On the other hand, the amount of both beef and lamb eaten declined considerably from 220 and 150 grams in 1979 to 110 and 60 grams in 2004, respectively although beef was consumed more than lamb over the period. In contrast, there was only a marginal drop of 10 grams in the figure for fish, which remained the least popular type of all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas Do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62427745665 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49499482258 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.065827636 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176959955545 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084882852606 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794397898676 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113770886968 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848888821268 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62427745665 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49499482258 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.065827636 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176959955545 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084882852606 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794397898676 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113770886968 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848888821268 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.