The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
The given chart below illustrates four types of waste paper, glass, tins, and garden which were gathered by the recycling center over the 4 years
Overall, it is clear that there was an upward trend in the percentage of all types of waste. In addition, paper waste had the highest figures, while the opposite was true with gardens throughout the period shown
The amount of paper waste collected in 2011 started at 57 tons, after which experienced a slight drop in the next three years 2012, 2013, and 20124 were at 50, 40, and 51 tons respectively, before going up to reach a peak of 70 tons in 2015. By contrast, at 32 tons of waste, the garden had the lowest rank in 2011, which declined by more than half tons ( 17) in 2012, followed by an uptick to 27 tons in 2014, and a final growth to 35 tons in 2015.
Regarding the glass, which stood at 48 tons in 2011 and decreased to 7 tons in 2012, with a subsequent rise to 52 tons in 2015. Similarly, 35 tons of tins also were collected in 2011, then dropped to 33 tons in 2014 before increasing to 39 tons in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- when choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 56
- M t s ng i ngh r ng s c kh e t t l r t quan tr ng i v i m i ng i v v y d ch v y t kh ng n n c i u h nh b i c c c ng ty v l i nhu n u i m c a d ch v y t t nh n c v t tr i h n nh c i m kh ng 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The given chart below illustrates four types of waste ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt below illustrates four types of waste paper, glass, tins, and garden which wer...
^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1, which declined by more than half tons 17 in 2012, followed by an uptick to 27 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, similarly, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35148514851 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28762692272 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569306930693 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.7988610404 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.8 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.4 22.9334400587 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168221886258 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981739067311 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307040221281 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106003553674 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518694442337 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.18 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.84 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.0658536585 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.