Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between poor people and rich people. Others think it is having an opposite effect. Discuss these points of view. What is your opinion?
Technology seems to promise infinite benefits for mankind. While it could be argued that the development of new technology always expands the gap between rich and poor, it is also true that the level of technology used in developing countries and low-income countries has been quicker than the developed countries over the last few years and this has helped to bridge the gap between the rich and the poor. So, both views have some ground which I shall be discussing in this essay.
There are many reasons why people say that technology increases the gap between rich and poor. To begin with, new technology itself tends to be affordable by only the richer elements of society and the poorer elements are denied the opportunities that this provides, such as the ability to be able to train for better paid work. It is understandable that because of their ability to acquire new technology, the learning ability within the richer elements of society is much improved. Therefore they get better job placements and continue to grow further.
What is more, with the power that wealth and knowledge brings, richer segments are more able to exert influence over the direction of society, usually to their own benefit. The poorer segment does not have this ability, and therefore their demands and needs tend to be driven lower down the list of political priorities.
On the other hand there are reasons to hold the opposite view. While it is true that the initial level of technology in lower-income countries was much lower to begin with, there is strong evidence of catch-up between middle-income and high-income countries. Technological progress increased 40% to 60% faster in developing countries than in rich countries. Use of some new technologies, such as mobile phones, has risen quickly.
Technology has created huge opportunities for the poor where none existed previously. For example, some technologies such as communications or networking give poor people a chance to earn a better living. It is not uncommon for some people who used to live in poverty becoming millionaires or billionaires by taking advantage of the internet. This has definitely led to narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that technology can do both – widen the gap between the rich and poor as well as narrow the gap if the poor get access to it. Therefore, it is not the technology to blame for the gap; it is the access to technology which is to blame. So, we should see to it that everyone gets equal access to technology.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-02-20 | khanhbang | 84 | view |
2022-09-21 | vishal sachdeva | 70 | view |
2021-05-03 | dhruv j patel | 78 | view |
2020-06-12 | rababuuuuuuu | 75 | view |
2019-12-08 | Mahesh04 | 81 | view |
- Some people think that it is more important to plant more trees in open area in towns and cities than building more housing To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- All education primary secondary and further education should be free to all people and paid for by government Do you agree or disagree with the statement 84
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give opinions 89
- You are about to start social meetings in a particular area where people from different nationalities can take part Write a letter to the editor of a local newspaper requesting him to publish information about this What activities you have planned When th 89
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 435 350
No. of Characters: 2079 1500
No. of Different Words: 208 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.567 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.779 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.705 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 140 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.529 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.65 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.303 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.466 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.09 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5