A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans,while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs,including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is an ongoing debate regarding animals and humans rights. A group of individuals believe that animals should be treated in the same way as humans and they have same rights. However, other are of the view that it is important to use them as different needs for food and medical research. Prior to my opinion, both the viewpoints would be understood.
Examining the former vies, the foremost argument pur forward by the proponents is that exploitation of animals, some people think it is good for few reasons. They believe that humans are the most crucial on the earth. And everything must be done for human survival. Moreover, it is believed by some people that animals do not feel pain as humans, so if we have to kill animals for food or other uses, this is justly acceptable.
On the contrary, those in favour of the latter opinion have their own arguments. To begin with, they claim that it has been shown on many events by animals rights groups that animals feel as much pain as humans and they also suffer when they are kept in cages fir long time of periods. Besides this, some of researches is done for cosmetics, not to find medications for illness, so this is useless. It has also shown that humans get all the nutrients and vitamins that they need from green vegetables and fruit. So this is not good to kill animals for food.
To sum up, and present mu outlook, I positively bolster the first viewpoint to a major extent. Killing Animals fir research and medications is virtuous but there is not good to kill animals for food. Therefore, steps must be taken to improve the rights of animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | mytinh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | snowacealex | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Alexspector | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Lê Nguyễn Hạnh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | bapcai | 73 | view |
- The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 61
- The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows the mom that expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant Australian dollar per month 1991 2001 Food 155 160 El 78
- The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the viewpoints would be understood. Examining the former vies, the foremost ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other uses, this is justly acceptable. On the contrary, those in favour of t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the researches') or simply say ''some researches''.
Suggestion: some of the researches; some researches
...fir long time of periods. Besides this, some of researches is done for cosmetics, not to find medi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s not good to kill animals for food. To sum up, and present mu outlook, I pos...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63763066202 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42311385938 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547038327526 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7219552971 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1875 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426330463783 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127845560115 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073903685392 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254622109808 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656635122121 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.