Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes? Can you suggest some possible solutions?
Today, most recruiters realize that their newly-hired staff are in the absence of soft skills, such as team working. In my perspective, there are some primary causes leading to this phenomenon. This essay will outline as well as present some measures to tackle them.
First of all, the lack of interpersonal skills in new employees is attributed to the education system. Tertiary education nowadays seems to focus on training students to excel in their major theoretical subjects rather than equipping them with fundamental soft skills. As a result, many fresh graduates are not able to cooperate effectively with their colleagues in the workplace despite owning extensive expertise. Secondly, the young wrongly assess the importance of interpersonal skills while they are still in school. According to a survey, more than 90% of interviewed students answered that they think that just achieving a good university degree is enough to work in big companies. Therefore, they spend too much their free time on social network surfing Facebook or even keeping eyes glued to the screen. This cause the lack of face to face interaction and the isolation of the real world. As a consequence, ability to communicate with the partners become worse as well.
However, there are some solutions that should be implemented by universities and every individuals in order to address the problem. Universities should clarify the importance of soft skills for students and encourage them to take part in clubs developing communication skills or workshops specializing in job-related skills. All of these activities will count toward overall GPA when they graduate instead of only compulsory subjects so as to ensure that they are well-equipped with appropriate workplace skills. Additionally, each person should set a limitation on doing no-worthy things. Instead, investing time engaging in soft skills classes or joining hands in social projects is considered a wiser choice
In conclusion, a lack of basic interpersonal skills in new employees stems from the education system and our own, and there are a number of feasible suggestions solve this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-24 | zhao_kangg | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | hueyy | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | binhan_04 | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 78
- How often do you change your car and What car do you buy 92
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 73
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000 and 2010 with projected sales for 2020 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 971, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...municate with the partners become worse as well. However, there are some soluti...
^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ate instead of only compulsory subjects so as to ensure that they are well-equipped with...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37388724036 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96439614689 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608308605341 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5264029627 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.1875 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249641744233 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711357345672 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056093174523 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14326642698 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615332208675 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.