Some people today have argued that countries should interfere less in the affairs of other nations.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many debates have taken place over the past few years over the issue of whether nations should restrict their intervention with other countries. In my school of thought, despite the theoretical ideal of this type of isolation, it would result in far-reaching problems today, given the political upheavals happening in some parts of the world.
Advocates of this change contend that it would allow countries to flourish independently. Throughout history, there have been thousands of bloodshed events in which countries tried hurting one another, most notoriously during European colonialism. However, there are evident problems also being bred. For example, the US often supports either overtly or ambiguously respective governments that are compliant with American interests. The positive result is that these countries have minimized autonomy to experience trials and errors, become more independent and eventually prosper. Despite the helpfulness of these interventions, as in the case of international aid, they all engender a sense of dependency.
Nevertheless, discarding all interference in other countries could give rise to many dire ramifications. The US is the perfect example here as it is most involved in world affairs. If the US discharged all of its international armed forces, it would leave vulnerable holes for other vicious countries to exploit and seize certain worthwhile economic zones and territories. Another example is when the US withdrew international troops from Iraq, leaving total control of the nation in the hand of the aggressive Taliban regime, causing significant ramifications in the middle east. This might be beneficial in the long term if the international community were to uphold isolationist policies. However, in the short term, there would be political upheavals that could lead to potential wars.
In conclusion, it is advisable for countries not to interfere deeply with the affairs of other nations, but this stance proves to be impracticable in the modern global village. Countries should instead find a way to support each other when needed while thriving for independence.
Some people today have argued that countries should interfere less in the affairs of other nations.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-08 | chinh11111 | 95 | view |
- Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of these views and give 84
- Nowadays a lot of offices have open space designs instead of separate rooms Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph shows children by age group as a percentage of the young population in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2001 78
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eeded while thriving for independence. Some people today have argued that count...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55172413793 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03191832602 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0330852817 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338547299764 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101239279878 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160254617157 0.0667982634062 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247249108126 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208398388469 0.056905535591 366% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.