It is important for government to spend public funds on promoting a healthy lifestyle than treatment of people who are already ill.
Do you agree or disagree?
it is argued that state budget should go to the promotion of a healthy lifestyle of citizens as long-term prevention against Illness rather than developing medicine to cure ill people. I, personally, believe that both should be well funded.
Regarding healthy lifestyle as it associates directly to increasing human resistance against fatal illnesses. These days, populations in developed countries are becoming increasingly overweight since they are leading a type of sedentary lifestyle and relying on fast food and pre-prepared meals, all of which attribute to the intensity of work and study life. Thus, obesity, diabetes and heart disease are on the rise. As a matter of fact, victims are little aware how their bad habits affecting their body and well-being. Therefore, government should allocate public money to launch propagation programs in order to raise public awareness, also they could set aside a proportion of money to build more public facilities and park for individuals to exercise.
In terms of investing in treatment for already ill people, the same amount of budget should go to the development of vaccines and therapeutic methods to cure ill individuals and prevent lethal illnesses. In recent years, there was a catastrophic disease so-called COVID-19 which has killed dozens of people around the world, but some wealthy countries have developed successfully means of preventing this fatal disease throughout vaccination. As a result, people who were badly sicked could be able to return to normal life and going to work and become a useful citizen, mostly thanks to a tremendous investment in prevention and treatment for illnesses.
In conclusion, as aforementioned above, government should have to provide finance equally for both promoting healthy lifestyle and healing ill individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-15 | chinh11111 | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | chinh11111 | 78 | view |
- Topic Some feel that movies and tv shows are a good way to study history despite their lack of historical accuracy To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 79
- The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In order to study at university students are required to pay costly fees Not all students can afford such expensive ones so some people think that university education should be free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that state budget should go t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49466192171 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9596305301 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6324502196 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.363636364 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229962465205 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764112405632 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697223574447 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144837382147 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362131903512 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.