The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.
The diagrams illustrate how a town's structure changed between 1990 and 2010 when a nearby hydroelectric power dam was constructed.
Overall, it is obvious that the town underwent a number of dramatic changes, the most significant of which are the disappearance of rare plants and animals, and a lake was dug in 2010 in order to cater to the manufacture of the dam.
In 1990, there was a long site with a forest, an ancient structure, and rare plants and animals in the western corner of the river. However, they were all destroyed to make way for the power poles in 2010. On the opposite side of the river, the villages were relocated closer to the river bank, south of the irrigated farmlands being converted into electricity pylons in 2010.
The north part of the town also witnessed a significant change. A hydroelectric power dam was built at the northern headwaters of the river in 2010, situated between two mountains. On top of the dam, there was a huge lake for sailing and fishing that did not exist until the year 2010, accompanied by the erection of a new hotel on the southeast of the lake.
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 84
- Most countries aim to improve their standard of living through economic development but many important social values can be lost as a result Do the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainme Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65306122449 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71666306813 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2135040004 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165193685807 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778337360662 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786395504621 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12016103893 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850855537496 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.