the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country between 1979 and 2004
The statistical line chart displays weekly food consumption including fish and other types of meats in a European nation in 5-year intervals, starting from 1979, measured in grams per person.
As indicated in the graph, it is reported for beef, lamb and fish to have a tendency to drop over the period despite beef seemed to be the most preferrable product at the beginning of the period. It is also worth mentioning that chicken tended to increase significantly and became popular in Europe’s recipes.
As transparent from the data, beef shown its starting point at over 200 grams per person per week. After that, this figure had a fluctuation to 1984 before falling gradually to around 100 grams in 2004. Moving to the consumption of chicken, the amount of chicken consumed was around 150 grams at the beginning of the period. Subsequently, a remarkable growth to nearly 250 grams was recorded to be the consumption of chicken.
Another considerable feature is lamb which held a similar beginning point with beef, approximately 250 grams. Then, there was a mild fluctuation from 1984 to 1999 before falling to just over 70 grams in 2004. Noticeably, around 60 grams of fish was reported to be consumed by Europe’s inhabitants in 1979 in spite of having a slight decrease to about 50 grams 5 years later. From 1984 to the end of the period, the amount of fish consumption experienced a stability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 84
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In some countries companies allow people to work from home In others people are still expected to work in an office Discuss both views and give your own opinion 75
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 78
- the world s population has been increasing significantly and people are running out of water food and fuel What consequences may overpopulation lead to What measures can be taken to fight overpopulation 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91176470588 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82654463353 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0498881898 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.272727273 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122783402081 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484763793931 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464149562612 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866638123813 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479839787323 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.