It is important for parents to read stories to children. Others think it is unnecessary because children can find them in other sources e.g books, and TV. Discuss both views and give opinions ?
Whether young individuals should listen to stories from their fathers and mothers or should they look for the stories themselves on other platforms such as books, TV, internet, is a topic of interest to the public. This essay will elaborate on the merits of both ways of absorbing lessons from stories.
It is thought that children who are red stories by their parents can be benefited in terms of linguistic development and trengthening the bond with their loved ones. By hearing the voice of their relatives for a long period of time, new born children can gradually distinguish the sound made by their parents from others, which implies that it can enhance their language ability. For older children, while hearing their parents' stories, young children often interact with them by asking relevant questions, which can encourage the conversations between kids and parents, therefore help both establish meaningful relationships.
On the other hand, the stories from books, television, and other media platform appear to be various and colorful, by which kids may find them more intriguing and easier to follow. Firstly, given recent technological breakthrough, there is a pleathora of stories available on the internet, which provides children with a wide range of options from genres, authors and so forth. An additional merit of stories from modern channels is that unlike stories being red by their parents, the stories from modern media platforms, which are designed with vivid and informative content seem more captivating and comprehensive to the young audience.
In sum, even though utilization of books and technological instruments to listen and watch stories are more fascinating to kids, I believe that it is most beneficial for children to listen the stories from their parents. This is because it gives them a sense of family solidarity and foster their ability to learn language.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 84
- In some countries schools are teaching foreign languages for primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organization rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 67
- Widespread of technology has given people more freedom to work instead of travelling to work or college Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...the voice of their relatives for a long period of time, new born children can gradually distin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, look, may, so, then, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.300330033 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77211220631 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557755775578 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.968601983 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.6 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259842137698 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106886534686 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452616572085 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153645931337 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288874046044 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.