Companies use major sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is becoming significantly common these days that economic organizations make use of sporting occasions to advertise their offerings. Some individuals object to the movement as it brings more harm than good to the development of sports. I somewhat disagree with this view as sports can be enormously beneficial from the firm sponsorship.
The first reason why I oppose that the use of sports for products promotion having negative impacts on sports is that given the financial resources from companies, organizers of the event would be able to invest in holding captivating sporting events. This attracts more audience and generating more profit for the relevant individuals and companies, which subsequently gives a boost to the local economy.
Another explanation for my support of sport advertisements is that it merits athletes in serveral dimensions. If professional attendants of sporting events accept to endorse or advertise the products of particular brands, they can receive a decent income and being provided with adequate nutrition, which enables the professionals to focus on their sport career and enhance their performance.
Admittedly, there are still occasions when firms may over-abuse advertising in sporting events. This especially the true of companies, which attempt to present their low-quality and harzadous products to customers. In this case, utilization of sporting championships would be a negative development.
In sum, special sporting events is a gateway for manufacturers to meet their potential buyers. Even though some firms may overuse the trend to sell goods with no redeeming features, the events generally opens up many opportunities for individuals and organizations to make money and improve their professional achievement. I somewhat object to the idea since the phenomenon brings more merits to people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 89
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In some cities public parks and open spaces are changed into gardens where local residents can grow their own fruit and vegetables Do you think the benefits outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some scientist thinks that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mprove their professional achievement. I somewhat object to the idea since the ph...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65357142857 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15329233517 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.330928185 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.92307692308 7.06120827912 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271572843135 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938735344371 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662799863298 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155668827994 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185958843222 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.