Many cities around the world are considering turning streets into car-free zones, which help curb pollution and make people healthier. However, some people believe that cities will suffer once this becomes the norm. In your opinion, what are the advantages and disadvantages of banning private cars in city centers?
Status quo of environmental pollution lends itself to be one of the most conspicuous blunders of the zenith of humanity’s development. As a rectificative measure, numerous authorities are set on banning usage of four-wheeled private vehicles in urban centers, which raises concern over associated repercussions of such a measure. I shall analyze both the demerits and merits of this policy in the forthcoming paragraphs.
Private vehicle restrictions among city hearts pose two noticeable negative developments. Firstly, public agreement presents an obstacle. Being deprived of their ability to use their own cars, anger would indubitably be stoked up among the general public. This is due to the effects of an individualist society where people are not willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good. Such a thing would impede an implementation of the policy or result in people resorting to circumventive tactics which would fail to alleviate pollution issues. A second downside of this approach is insidious economic consequences. As such a ban would serve to discourage future car purchases, countries that thrive on the automobile manufacturing industry would suffer from plummeted sales. However, these aftereffects are usually ephemeral and people would soon move on to adapt to the policy and foster immense benefits.
On the other hand, a palpable positive implication of restricting private transport lies in its benefit for the environment and city-dwellers’ life. Absence of diesel-powered automobiles would tantamount to a reduction in emitted carbon dioxide volume along with other toxic gasses. As such, time is reserved for existing plants and trees to clean the air and recover, along with freed space for traditional activities such as kid playing, paint displays etc. and reduced traffic congestion. Ergo, people are benefited from air tranquility and people suffering from lung conditions such as asthma are no longer confined in cramped indoor places.
More notably, this policy has the ability to drastically alter people’s mindset and habits for the better. With the ban of private cars comes the encouraged use of public transport, elevating its prevalence as a better alternative. In addition, because people are steered from car purchases, alternatives are empowered to gain popularity. Electric motorcycles, a relatively new technology, would be allowed to grow into acceptance.
In conclusion, public outcry and momentary economic sufferings are two short-term down-sides of banning car use, whereas this policy would be a candidate for resolving environmental issues along with positively reshaping people’s lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-28 | hungdung2507 | 85 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | hungdung2507 | 95 | view |
- In some countries private cars are now banned from certain city centres What are the advantages of such a system and do you feel that this is something that most cities should adopt 78
- As mass communication and transport continue to grow societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity To what extent d 89
- Technology can be a threat to the survival of a language but it can also serve as a powerful tool to preserve even restore languages Discuss the statement and give your opinion 78
- The power of modern devices lies in their ability to allow us to connect but at the same time disconnect with each other We now have more relationships online but at the same time less relationships offline In your opinion does technology bring us closer 78
- It is said that countries should produce all food for their population to eat and import as little as possible. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ould indubitably be stoked up among the general public. This is due to the effects of an indiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 884, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... soon move on to adapt to the policy and foster immense benefits. On the other h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, so, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17395258314 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4858136113 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0476190476 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141247216062 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403852581963 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328991254877 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790213648705 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026514833996 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 78.4519038076 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.