Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinions
Exploring celestial planets is one of the most fantastic dreams of many people, especially scientists. The primary motivation behind the dream was a passion for learn about life on other planets. From that, a number of scientists think that there are wonderful and modern life on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them, other think that it is a crazy idea and would be hazardous. From my perspective, space exploration is the best method for improving communication between Earth and other planets.
On the one hand, communicating with extraterrestrial life is made possible by sending signals to other planets. Previous the Earth, there are numerous planets appear. Hence, with that communication, humans will have opportunities to learn and exchange advanced technology with alien planets. Thus, the Earth can become more convenient and develop. The most crucial purpose of that connection is helping humans to answer whether there are celestial planets. If humans are able to send a signal into space and receive a response. It follows that there are living beings and life on other planets.
On the other side, one of the horrible effects of connectivity is that it will make aliens mad and cause them to colonize Earth. People don’t know the appearance of the aliens and furthermore, there is a supposed that aliens have a modern technology and weapon. Due to the fact that, people are unable to defend themselves from their attacks if the make an invasion.
In conclusion, even though the Earth may has some dangers, I still believe that connecting to other planets will help the planet become developed and technological.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-10-30 | dhuy | 73 | view |
2022-10-30 | Luisjackiet | 56 | view |
2022-10-30 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
2021-01-19 | vyhanh | 84 | view |
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollutions and housing problems To what extent do you agree to disagree with this statement 67
- Is it better to teach a child at home or in school discuss the disadvantages of both topics 67
- Different people have different approaches to life Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences Which category do you fall into and why Give reasons for your answer and use specific examples to support your answer 78
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people think there is a general increase in anti social behavior and a lack of respect for others What do you think are the causes of this and how to improve it What solutions can you suggest 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...would be hazardous. From my perspective, space exploration is the best method for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, still, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12222222222 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80231385875 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551851851852 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8704972383 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252936279356 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802456954011 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137314877727 0.0667982634062 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144871509747 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122509879227 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...would be hazardous. From my perspective, space exploration is the best method for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, still, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12222222222 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80231385875 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551851851852 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8704972383 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252936279356 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802456954011 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137314877727 0.0667982634062 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144871509747 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122509879227 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.